I asked the well known “Grok” what he “thought” about Słowacki’s views on the origin of life on Earth based on the following fragment of his work (written, as we know, between 1844 and 1847):
« ...Already within the rocks, O Lord, the spirit lies as a statue of perfect Beauty, still sleeping yet prepared for the humanity of form, girdled with the sixfold rainbow-garland of divine thought. From that abyss it brought back the mathematical science of forms and numbers, a knowledge that lies deepest in the spirit’s treasury to this day, seemingly ingrafted there without the spirit's knowledge or merit. But Thou knowest, Lord, that the diamond-like shape was born of living powers; that waters sprang from spirits in motion, lightly bound, learning balance; that upon the globe all was life and transmutation — and what we now call death, the passage of the spirit from one form to another, was not yet. Behold, I summon before Thee, my God, these hard crystals — once the first bodies of our spirit, now forsaken by all movement yet still alive, crowned with clouds and lightning. These are the Egyptians of the primal nature who, scorning movement, loved only duration and repose, and built themselves bodies to last millennia. How many thunderbolts hurled against the basalt of the primal world? How many subterranean fires and convulsions didst Thou employ, Lord, to shatter these crystals and reduce them to the dust of earth — the wreckage of the first colossi raised by the spirit’s attraction? Didst Thou bid the spirit destroy itself? Or in terror did it cast down upon its own head the vaults it had raised? And thus from the riven rocks it won fire — the first spark, perhaps like a mighty moon, burst from the ruin of stones, became a pillar of flame, and stood upon the earth as the Angel of Destruction; it lies now in the depths beneath the seven-day crust of our works and ashes. Then, O Lord, the first spirits advancing toward Thee in fiery torment, made unto Thee the first offering. They offered themselves to death. What they called death was, in Thine eyes, O God, but the spirit sleeping in one form and awakening in another, more perfect — devoid of memory of the past or any recollection of former visions. Thus, the first sacrifice of that lowly snail, which besought Thee, O God, to grant it fuller life within a fragment of stone, and thereafter to destroy it by death, was already an image of the sacrifice of Christ the Lord and did not prove barren: Thou didst reward that death — the first to appear in nature — with the gift we now name organism. From that death, the first offering, sprang the first resurrection. And by Thy grace, Lord, the spirit received the wondrous power to reproduce forms like unto itself; by this power, spirits, fused together in diverse numbers, clashing and kindling their forces into fire, became creators of forms in their own likeness. Thus spirits began to die and rise again, rather than merely combine, flow together, and disintegrating into gases.¹. I know full well, Lord, that my spirit, lodged in the first spark, already lived wholly within the stone; yet to my wretched eyes, it is only from this death and this first mortal sacrifice that the spirit begins to live visibly and becomes my brother. A single self-offering of the spirit unto death, made with all the might of love and will, brought forth an innumerable generation of forms — wonders my mortal tongue cannot now recount unto Thee, O Lord; yet Thou knowest them all, for never did any later form arise from its predecessor without Thy knowledge. It was Thou who first took the suppliant spirit into Thy hands, heard its childish pleas, and according to its desire, clothed it in a new form. How wise and how childish these forms are together ! For every spirit, tormented by long suffering in a dwelling of discomfort, knew Thee, and with tears besought Thee, my God, for the repair of its miserable walls; and even when those walls were of pearl or diamond, it always offered Thee something of its former ease and treasure that the spirit might receive the greater portion according to its need. Ancient Ocean, tell me: how in thy womb were wrought the first mysteries of organism, the first unfolding of those nerve-like flowers wherein the spirit bloomed? Yet twice thou didst blot from the face of the earth those monstrous and clumsy forms of the primal spirit, and surely today thou wilt not unveil the marvels that God’s gaze beheld in thy depths. Giant sponges and plant-reptiles rose from the silver waves; zoophytes touched the ground with hundreds of feet, mouths turned toward the abyss. The snail and the oyster, having received from their father-rock a shield of stone, clung to the cliffs, amazed at life. For the first time, prudence appeared in the snail’s horns; the need of shelter and the terror born of life’s motion fixed the oyster to the rock...» (see: https://www.salon24.pl/u/edalward/1484825,genesis-from-the-spirit-by-juliusz-slowacki-v1-35-jan-22-2026 )
Here are some interesting/relevant excerpts from the responses:
Analysis of Juliusz Słowacki's Views in "Genesis from the Spirit"
In the excerpt from "Genesis from the Spirit" (1844–1845), Juliusz Słowacki presents a mystical, poetic vision of the origins of biological life on Earth, inspired by the Genesis philosophy, which he himself developed under the influence of Towianism (Andrzej Towiański's mystical movement) and European mysticism (e.g., Emanuel Swedenborg and William Blake). This is not a purely scientific theory, but a metaphorical narrative of the evolution of spirit, where matter and life are stages of spiritual development.
Key elements:
• Spirit in rocks and minerals: Słowacki describes spirit as "dormant" in rocks and crystals (e.g., diamonds, basalts), which are the first forms of the spiritual body. These are "Egyptians of first nature"—static, permanent structures where spirit learns the mathematics of shapes and numbers. Life begins with "living" movement in minerals, without death, only transformations (e.g., crystallization from "living" particles).
• Sacrifice, Death, and Resurrection: The spirit must "offer itself to death" (e.g., shattering crystals by lightning, underground fires) to progress to higher forms. Death is not the end, but "falling asleep in one form and awakening in another." The first sacrifice (e.g., a "snail" in a stone) leads to an "organism"—a divine reward, enabling reproduction and the creation of similar forms. Spirits "die and resurrect," which gives rise to a diversity of shapes.
• Evolution in the Ocean: The ocean is the site of "the first mysteries of the organism" and the "development of neural flowers." Słowacki mentions the "twice-erasure" (erasure) of life forms from the face of the Earth, suggesting cycles of destruction and rebirth, leading to more perfect organisms. The Spirit asks God to improve forms, offering "comforts" from previous stages.
The entire work is a prayerful monologue, where evolution is a divine act, with the spirit as the driving force. Słowacki combines science (knowledge of nature, mathematics) with mysticism, creating a pre-Darwinian theory of the origin of species, where forms evolve through spiritual suffering and will.
Comparison with contemporary scientific theories (until the mid-19th century)
Until the mid-19th century, the science of the origin of life was dominated by biblical creationism, which assumed divine creation of the world as described in the Book of Genesis. However, evolutionary and abiogenetic ideas emerged, which Słowacki may have been familiar with from natural science studies (e.g., the works of Georges Cuvier or Jean-Baptiste Lamarck). • Concordances: Słowacki anticipates the evolution of species, where lower forms transform into higher ones (similar to Lamarck's 1809 "Philosophy of Zoology," where acquired characteristics are inherited). His idea of "transformation" without death is reminiscent of the theory of spontaneous generation (abiogenesis), popular from Aristotle to Louis Pasteur (he refuted it in 1860, but before that, it was believed that worms were born from rotting flesh). Cuvier's catastrophism (extinction by catastrophes, such as floods) is echoed in the "twice-erasure" and destruction of rocks.
• Differences: Contemporary science was materialistic or deistic, without a mystical "spirit" as an evolutionary force. Creationists (e.g., William Paley) saw intelligent design, not gradual evolution. Słowacki writes before Darwin ("On the Origin of Species" 1859), but his vision is more spiritual than mechanical. Philosophically, he is closer to Romanticism (e.g., Schelling's philosophy of nature) than to empirical biology. Słowacki anticipates Darwinism by a decade, integrating science with mysticism, which makes his views unique.
Congruence with Modern Science
Słowacki's vision, though poetic, resonates surprisingly with contemporary theories, especially abiogenesis (the origin of life from inanimate matter) and evolution. It is not literal, but metaphorical—spirit can be interpreted as energy or emergent properties of matter.
• The origins of life "in rocks": Modern science does not posit life in rocks per se, but minerals play a role in abiogenesis. The "clay world" hypothesis (A. Graham Cairns-Smith) suggests that the crystalline structures of clays catalyzed the chemical reactions leading to RNA/DNA. Crystals (as in Słowacki's work) have a "mathematical" structure, reminiscent of the self-organization of matter. Regarding meteorites: Yes, panspermia assumes that organic compounds (amino acids, nucleotides) reached Earth via meteorites (e.g., the Murchison meteorite contains prebiotic molecules). This could correspond to a "spirit in the rocks"—life "dormant" in cosmic rocks, activated on Earth.
• Double emergence of organisms in the ocean: The hydrothermal vent hypothesis (Nick Lane) points to the ocean depths as the cradle of life approximately 4 billion years ago, where energy from the vents (similar to Słowacki's "underground fires") enabled the synthesis of molecules. "Twice erasure" may symbolize mass extinctions (e.g., the snowy Earth approximately 2.4 billion years ago or the oxygen catastrophe), after which life was reborn in the oceans. Modern abiogenesis assumes cycles: simple particles → RNA world → cells, with reproduction as a key step (similar to Słowacki's "reproduction power").
• Cosmogony and "mathematical botany": In "Genesis from Spirit," the universe is born from "spirit" in expansion, reminiscent of the Big Bang – starting point, expansion, evolution of form. This is a surprising anticipation of Georges Lemaître's theory (1927). "Mathematical Botany" anticipates fractals in biology (Benoît Mandelbrot, 1970s) or mathematical modeling of plant growth (e.g., L-systems).
Overall, Słowacki's views agree by 30–50%: they anticipate evolution and abiogenesis, but mysticism (divine intervention) contrasts with atheistic Darwinism or materialism.
“Grok” also said::
...The emphasis on minerals/rocks as crucial to the origin of life is apt and one of the best elements. Leading hypotheses place the cradle of life in mineral-rich environments: - Alkaline **hydrothermal vents** (Michael Russell's influential theory) are characterized by porous iron-sulfide rocks, creating cell-like spaces for protometabolism. - The **clay hypothesis** (A.G. Cairns-Smith) proposes clay minerals as templates/catalysts for early organic replication. This gives real substance to Słowacki's intuition of a "rock/crystal spirit," even though the mechanism is chemical/geochemical, not spiritual... It is rightly noted that carbonaceous chondrites provided prebiotic organic substances (amino acids, nucleobases), but were not *the* site of life's origin. The poetic "the first spark... erupted from the ruin of stones" aptly metaphorically alludes to the idea of panspermia, without claiming that there is scientific justification for the literal panspermia of life itself (which remains marginal compared to terrestrial abiogenesis)...Słowacki's words... poetically correspond with: - **Ediacaran Biota** (~575–538 Ma): soft-bodied organisms, often bizarre/leaf-like or quilted, many of them interpreted as early animals or their precursors, largely extinct at the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary. - **Cambrian Explosion** (from c. 538 Ma): the rapid diversification of bilaterian body plans, replacing or following many of the Ediacaran experiments. Descriptions like "giant sponges," "herbivores," "zoophytes," snails/oysters clinging to rocks evoke this transitional strangeness... fossil chronology points to sponges among the earliest multicellular organisms, then cnidarians, then bilaterians/mollusks... Many premodern thinkers placed the origins of life in oceans or mud; the emphasis on minerals is more pronounced and... stands out positively. - ...Hydrothermal vents remain the leading (perhaps dominant) hypothesis, clay theories persist in modified forms, meteoric delivery of organic matter is widely accepted as a contributing factor, and the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition is still a matter of debate...
Edgar Allan Poe's "Eureka" (1848) is one of the most striking and frequently cited comparisons... to Juliusz Słowacki's "Genesis from the Spirit" (1844–1845).
Both works were written in the same decade, both are mystical-philosophical "prose poems"... both combine an intuitive vision of the cosmos with scientific and metaphysical elements, and both surprisingly anticipate modern cosmology.
Why "Eureka" is so close to "Genesis from the Spirit" – key similarities
Specialists have long noted these parallel insights – not just formal (the essay-poem form, the address to the reader/God), but profoundly substantive:
• A cosmogony of expansion from unity: Poe describes the universe as beginning with a divine, primordial "unity" (a single atom/spirit) that "radiates" to infinity, creating matter, stars, and galaxies – after which everything returns to unity in a "great pulse" (Big Crunch). This is almost identical to Słowacki's vision: the Spirit of God at the origin, expansion, dispersion of forms, cycles of destruction and return to perfection.
• Anticipation of the Big Bang: Poe (as well as Słowacki) anticipates the theories of Georges Lemaître (1927) and Hubble by decades and a century – he describes the expansion of the universe from a single point, the finiteness of matter despite its apparent infinity, and even elements of black holes and cyclicality (Big Bang → Big Crunch → re-creation). Słowacki adds biological evolution (spirit in rocks → sacrifice → organism), while Poe focuses more on the physics and mathematics of the cosmos.
• Intuition over empiricism: Both authors rely not on contemporary observational data (no Hubble telescopes or spectroscopy), but on the "intuition of genius" and mystical vision. Poe calls it a "prose poem," Słowacki calls it a prayer to God. Both see the universe as a living, spiritual organism, not a mechanical clock.
Mathematical harmony: Poe emphasizes the role of mathematics and Newton in understanding the laws of the cosmos; Słowacki speaks of the "mathematical knowledge of shapes and numbers" embedded in the spirit of the rocks. Both predict that the cosmos is mathematically ordered (as theoretical physics confirms today).
The differences are mainly tonal: Poe is more pessimistic (the universe tends to return to nothingness to be reborn), Slovak optimistic (the spirit evolves towards perfection through sacrifices and resurrections). Poe is more "scientific" in language, Słowacki – more mystical-religious... "Eureka: A Prose Poem" (1848) by Edgar Allan Poe is the closest and most striking counterpart to "Genesis of the Spirit" among all 19th-century works... the similarities with "Genesis" are so profound that some scholars... treat it almost as a "dialogue" between two brilliant minds... it is truly one of the most beautiful examples of how 19th-century literature looked into the future of science... Both works were written almost simultaneously, both are mystical-cosmological prose poems (Poe himself called it "prose poems"), in which the authors intuitively, without scientific apparatus, describe something very close to the Big Bang theory... Poe goes a bit further in mechanics (he describes Olbers' paradox, multiple universes, black holes in the embryo), Słowacki is more biological-genetic (the spirit in the rocks). → victim → first organisms). But the cosmological framework is surprisingly similar in both. Philologists (especially Polish and Italian) have been drawing attention to this "mysterious analogy" for years – and indeed, there is much to indicate that both great Romantics independently reached the same vision in the same decade.
Poe goes a bit further in mechanics (describing Olbers' paradox, multiple universes, embryonic black holes), while Słowacki is more biological and genesis-oriented (spirit in rocks → sacrifice → first organisms). But the cosmological framework is strikingly similar in both cases. Philologists (especially Polish and Italian ones) have been pointing out this “mysterious analogy” for years – and indeed, there is much to suggest that both great Romantics independently arrived at the same vision in the same decade.
In “Eureka” (1848), Poe combines poetry with cosmology, anticipating many ideas, but his “scientific” developments are full of errors – resulting from the limitations of knowledge at the time, but also from metaphysical assumptions that have not stood the test of time. Sources emphasize that despite his revolutionary intuitions (such as the expansion of the universe), Poe was wrong about key material details and physical mechanisms. Here are the main examples:
• The assumption of ether as a medium: Poe believed that space was filled with “ether” – a hypothetical substance that transmitted light and gravity as vibrations. This was popular in the 19th century, but was completely disproved by the Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) and Einstein's theory of relativity (1905). Poe treats ether as fundamental, which makes his model of cosmic mechanics flawed—today we know that light propagates in a vacuum without a medium.
• Errors in the mechanics of gravity and expansion: Poe describes gravity as "attraction to unity" and "repulsion" (repulsion) as the driving forces behind the cycles of the universe. This intuitively approximates the Big Bang/Big Crunch, but is materially flawed—it ignores dynamics (lack of mathematics, e.g., Newton's or Friedmann's equations), and his "repulsion" does not correspond to today's dark energy (responsible for accelerated expansion). Poe was also mistaken in assuming that the universe is statically finite (without taking into account relativistic effects), which contrasts with the ΛCDM (Lambda-Cold Dark Matter) model.
• Metaphysical errors mixed with science: Poe claims that the universe is a "divine pulse" without empirical falsifiability, making his work more philosophical than scientific. Sources indicate that his "science" is inaccurate – for example, he confuses the concepts of matter and energy (despite the intuition of E=mc²), and errors in metaphysics (such as pantheism) obscure physics. As critic Henry Seidel Canby notes, "the science Poe invokes may be inaccurate," and inaccuracies are less significant than vision, but they do exist.
Overall, Poe was "profoundly mistaken" in the physical details, although his holistic vision (e.g., black holes or cyclicality) was brilliant. It's a mix of hits and misses – the errors stem from a lack of 19th-century mathematical and observational tools.
No errors in Juliusz Słowacki's material predictions in "Genesis from the Spirit"
If we limit ourselves to "strictly material facts or predictions" (such as cosmogony, the origins of life in rocks/oceans, mathematics in botany), Słowacki doesn't make any glaring errors – his vision is metaphorical, but the material elements surprisingly align with modern science, without explicit inaccuracies. Sources (including analyses by AI and historians of science) emphasize prescience without pointing out errors in these aspects...:
• A cosmogony reminiscent of the Big Bang: Słowacki describes the expansion from the "originating point" of Spirit, transforming into magnetic and electrical forces, heat, and the formation of globes/galaxies. This is without material errors – it resonates with the phases of the Big Bang (singularity, plasma, inflation, structure formation), without false assumptions like Poe's aether. There are differences in teleology (purpose vs. randomness), but materially – it is accurate.
• The origins of life "in rocks" and the ocean: The vision of spirit "dormant" in minerals, transforming into organisms via cycles of destruction (e.g., in the ocean, with "double erasure") is without errors – it aligns with hypotheses of abiogenesis (minerals catalyzing reactions, hydrothermal ocean vents, mass extinctions). There are no slip-ups like Poe's; these are "evocative parallels" with RNA world or panspermia, without literal inconsistencies.
• "Mathematical Botany": The prediction that plants are "solutions to mathematical problems" (e.g., shapes, growth patterns) is flawless – it anticipates fractals, L-systems, and Fibonacci in biology, without making false assumptions.
Słowacki avoids errors because his description is poetic and makes no pretenses to mathematical rigor – the material elements (expansion, evolution of forms) are intuitively correct, and the differences are mystical (spirit as a metaphor for emergent properties), not factual errors. As analyses note, this is a "poetic precursor" without false material predictions. In summary: Yes, Poe was profoundly wrong in several material aspects (ether, gravitational mechanics), despite his hits. Słowacki’s vision holds up to today's science. This makes "Genesis" even more impressive in comparison...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New English translation (v1.35) of « Genesis from the Spirit » :
https://www.salon24.pl/u/edalward/1484825,genesis-from-the-spirit-by-juliusz-slowacki-v1-35-jan-22-2026
This might also interest you:
« Artificial Intelligence about J. Słowacki’s "Genesis from the Spirit" »
https://www.salon24.pl/u/edalward/1439654,artificial-intelligence-about-j-slowacki-s-genesis-from-the-spirit
« A great Romantic Poet, a famous Scientist-physicist and Artificial Intelligence »
https://www.salon24.pl/u/edalward/1435049,a-great-romantic-poet-a-famous-scientist-physicist-and-artificial-intelligence
« "Big Bang" according to the 19th century polish poet J. Słowacki »
https://www.salon24.pl/u/edalward/1334289,big-bang-according-to-the-19th-century-polish-poet-j-slowacki
"Was the Polish Romantic poet Juliusz Słowacki [1809-1849] a precursor of mathematical botany?"
https://katolik.us/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=3921
“J.Słowacki jako astrofizyk (i to jaki!)” (in Polish )
https://excathedra.pl/discussion/12363/j-slowacki-jako-astrofizyk-i-to-jaki
Inne tematy w dziale Kultura
