Urwane wątki - badania stanu wojennego, wezwanie do badaczy

Chciałbym podać do opinii publicznej trochę materiału gdzie urwały się moje wątki badań Stanu Wojennego. Pewnie gdybym się tym zajął na poważnie dostałbym jakiś doktorat (gdybym chociaż miał magistra) - niestety jestem tylko samozwańczym inżynierem. Do badań pochodzę jednak solidnie. Czytelnicy zresztą z poniższego artykułu zobaczą moją metodologię i że nie wymyślam sobie tego co pisałem o stanie wojennym.

Być może czytelnicy mieli okazję czytać moje artykuły o Stanie Wojennym, ale zająłem się podróżami. Dlatego wzywam i apeluję - proszę niech ktoś to podejmie! Podaję wątki śledcze na tacy.

Gdzie się urywają moje badania?

Sejm

Prawie udało mi się dostać przed wyjazdem dostęp do tajnego archiwum Sejmu - to nie takie trudne. Znajduje się tam coś co powinno dawno ujrzeć światło dzienne. Plan "Sewer". Plan potencjalnej czechosłowackiej interwencji w PRL na wypadek gdyby Jaruzelski zawiódł. Z marszrutami, działaniami służb specjalnych, służb propagandowych. Został on przekazany przez Czechy polskiej ambasadzie. Może po publikacji wreszcie niektórzy historycy przestaliby pisać, że nie było żadnych planów interwencji w PRL. Oczywiście że były! Ale oczywiście tylko wtedy gdyby Jaruzelski zawiódł. Do dzieła! Chcę go zobaczyć na Salonie. Ja niestety przebywam w Norwegii.

Moskwa

Wydaje się że sowieckie archiwa są tajne ale niezupełnie. Do zupełnie nieznanych notatek dotarła profesor Jażborowska. Dotarła do tzw. Planu B. Dlaczego IPN nigdy o tym nie napisał? Notatka komisji Susłowa z dnia 18 października 1981 o powołaniu polskiego gabinetu cieni jest w posiadaniu pani profesor Jażborowskiej. Gdyby Jaruzelski dalej wyczyniał wolty miał zostać zastąpiony bardziej uległą grupą. Namówiłem moskiewskiego korespondenta GW pana Wacława Radziwinowicza na przeprowadzenie wywiadu. Pechowo akurat zmarł mąż pani profesor. Na tym rzecz się urwała. Jednak ktoś powinien z nią porozmawiać. Gdzie jest IPN? Halo? Czy to dlatego nie rozmawia się z nią że pisała umiarkowaną książkę "Białe Plamy Czarne Plamy" pod kierownictwem polskiego MSZ? Ponadto posiada kilkadziesiąt relacji sowieckich wojskowych którzy potencjalnie przygotowywali się do marszu na PRL. Podaję sensacyjne źródło na talerzu! Do dzieła.

Londyn

Mimo że generał Jaruzelski wije się jak piskorz to wiadomo już z 3 źródeł że prosił on ZSRR o interwencję. Jedno z nich to Archiwum Mitrochina. Poprosiłem profesora Christophera Andrew o oryginalne dokumenty - niestety ponownie zostały utajnione ale powiedział on że podpisuje się pod tym co napisał. Archiwum Mitrochina to zestaw dokumentów dostarczonych przez zbiegłego archiwistę KGB. Występuje tam takze Polska i Jaruzelski. Dostęp do tych dokumentów JEST MOZLIWY. Poprosiłem o ewentualne zajęcie się tym profesora Antoniego Dudka z IPN - niestety IPN nie chcialo podjąć się aktywnej roli, ale chętnie uzyskałoby dokumenty o ile bym takie zdobył. Wzywam naprawdę do zajęcia się tym.

Ponieważ Christopher Andrew jest istotnym źródłem w tej sprawie to zamieszczam pełną korespondencję:

Lukasz Rzepinski <lukaszrzepinski@gmail.com>

07.02.2012

do cma1001

Dear professor Andrew

I am private researcher and publicist working on Polish Martial Law
documents. I am working in cooperation with Jagiellonian University in
Krakow and Institute of National Memory gathering top Polish
historians working on Martial law subject like professor Dudek or
professor Paczkowski.

I am writing you because of the fact that Polish debate found itself
in a stalemate. One of the hotpoints of the debate is so called
"Anoshkin notepad" - I do not know if Mr Professor heard about it. In
1997 there was a conference involving all the parties of Martial Law
including general Jaruzelski and marshall Kulikov. General Anoshkin
was Kulikov's adjutant and during the conference his private diary was
shown for the first time. The diary presents general Anoshkin's from
the meetings that occured in December 1981 with Polish HQ including
Jaruzelski and Siwicki.

However the authenticity of the diary has been challenged. It has been
noticed that it was not features of typical military document: there
is no military template, no notes numbering etc. It resembles rather
private diary and that is why it is challenged.

But when compared with your book "Mitrokhin's Archive" it seems that
this notepad is fully compatible. Especially when it comes to events
which happened at night of December 8th/9th when general Jaruzelski
and Siwicki met Marshall Kulikov.
In your book you are refering to a note marked "k-20, 327". It is very
crucial note for Martial Law researchers.

Here I am getting to the point of my letter, I would like to ask: Is
it possible to see and publish the original note of Mitrokihn Archive
including the date and all its content? It will drive the historical
debate out of the stalemate. The full text can confirm the events of
that night which is denied by general Jaruzelski, Siwicki. They are
denying the fact they had ever asked for Soviet military intervention.

My question is also relevant to the other Mitrokhin notes regarding
this topic, for example Milewski's reports to Warsaw's KGB (k-20,
308).

Please advice how it is possible to have a query refering to the
Archive. I am consious it might be not so easy but please advice what
is the legal entity that should be asked for. The documents can move
scientific debate forward and of course I would like to share them
with Polish Acadamy of Science, Polish Jagiellonionan University and
Institute of National Memory.

Yours truly

Lukasz Rzepinski <lukaszrzepinski@gmail.com>

07.02.2012

do akdudek, cma1001

I am adding to CC prof. Antoni Dudek from Polish Institute of National
Remembrance which is the entity running lots of research programmes
regarding Martial Law and holder of original documents like mentioned
"Anoshkin Notepad"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lukasz Rzepinski <lukaszrzepinski@gmail.com>
Date: 2012/2/7
Subject: Polish Martial Law research programme and Mitrokhin documents
To: cma1001@cam.ac.uk

Dear professor Andrew

I am private researcher and publicist working on Polish Martial Law
documents.

I am writing you because of the fact that Polish debate found itself
in a stalemate. One of the hotpoints of the debate is so called
"Anoshkin notepad" - I do not know if Mr Professor heard about it. In
1997 there was a conference involving all the parties of Martial Law
including general Jaruzelski and marshall Kulikov. General Anoshkin
was Kulikov's adjutant and during the conference his private diary was
shown for the first time. The diary presents general Anoshkin's from
the meetings that occured in December 1981 with Polish HQ including
Jaruzelski and Siwicki.

However the authenticity of the diary has been challenged. It has been
noticed that it was not features of typical military document: there
is no military template, no notes numbering etc. It resembles rather
private diary and that is why it is challenged.

But when compared with your book "Mitrokhin's Archive" it seems that
this notepad is fully compatible. Especially when it comes to events
which happened at night of December 8th/9th when general Jaruzelski
and Siwicki met Marshall Kulikov.
In your book you are refering to a note marked "k-20, 327". It is very
crucial note for Martial Law researchers.

Here I am getting to the point of my letter, I would like to ask: Is
it possible to see and publish the original note of Mitrokihn Archive
including the date and all its content? It will drive the historical
debate out of the stalemate. The full text can confirm the events of
that night which is denied by general Jaruzelski, Siwicki. They are
denying the fact they had ever asked for Soviet military intervention.

My question is also relevant to the other Mitrokhin notes regarding
this topic, for example Milewski's reports to Warsaw's KGB (k-20,
308).

Please advice how it is possible to have a query refering to the
Archive. I am consious it might be not so easy but please advice what
is the legal entity that should be asked for. The documents can move
scientific debate forward and of course I would like to share them
with Polish Acadamy of Science, Polish Jagiellonionan University and
Institute of National Memory.

Yours truly

Lukasz Rzepinski

Christopher Andrew <cma1001@gmail.com>

08.02.2012

do mnie, akdudek

angielski

polski

Przetłumacz wiadomość

Wyłącz dla następującego języka: angielski

Dear Mr Rzepinski

When I worked on the Mitrokhin material it was still classified

I've had no access to it since 2005, since when I've been working on other material

The Wilson Center (Cold War International History project) in Washington published a digest by M of some of the Afghan material

I don't know whether it had access to the Polish material

Mitrokhin's material in my view reliably records the contents of KGB archives, but i've nothing to add to what M and I wrote in 1999

best wishes

Christopher Andrew

On 7 February 2012 21:22, Lukasz Rzepinski <lukaszrzepinski@gmail.com> wrote:

I am adding to CC prof. Antoni Dudek from Polish Institute of National
Remembrance which is the entity running lots of research programmes
regarding Martial Law and holder of original documents like mentioned
"Anoshkin Notepad"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lukasz Rzepinski <lukaszrzepinski@gmail.com>
Date: 2012/2/7
Subject: Polish Martial Law research programme and Mitrokhin documents
To: cma1001@cam.ac.uk

Dear professor Andrew

I am private researcher and publicist working on Polish Martial Law
documents.

I am writing you because of the fact that Polish debate found itself
in a stalemate. One of the hotpoints of the debate is so called
"Anoshkin notepad" - I do not know if Mr Professor heard about it. In
1997 there was a conference involving all the parties of Martial Law
including general Jaruzelski and marshall Kulikov. General Anoshkin
was Kulikov's adjutant and during the conference his private diary was
shown for the first time. The diary presents general Anoshkin's from
the meetings that occured in December 1981 with Polish HQ including
Jaruzelski and Siwicki.

However the authenticity of the diary has been challenged. It has been
noticed that it was not features of typical military document: there
is no military template, no notes numbering etc. It resembles rather
private diary and that is why it is challenged.

But when compared with your book "Mitrokhin's Archive" it seems that
this notepad is fully compatible. Especially when it comes to events
which happened at night of December 8th/9th when general Jaruzelski
and Siwicki met Marshall Kulikov.
In your book you are refering to a note marked "k-20, 327". It is very
crucial note for Martial Law researchers.

Here I am getting to the point of my letter, I would like to ask: Is
it possible to see and publish the original note of Mitrokihn Archive
including the date and all its content? It will drive the historical
debate out of the stalemate. The full text can confirm the events of
that night which is denied by general Jaruzelski, Siwicki. They are
denying the fact they had ever asked for Soviet military intervention.

My question is also relevant to the other Mitrokhin notes regarding
this topic, for example Milewski's reports to Warsaw's KGB (k-20,
308).

Please advice how it is possible to have a query refering to the
Archive. I am consious it might be not so easy but please advice what
is the legal entity that should be asked for. The documents can move
scientific debate forward and of course I would like to share them
with Polish Acadamy of Science, Polish Jagiellonionan University and
Institute of National Memory.

Yours truly

Lukasz Rzepinski

Lukasz Rzepinski <lukaszrzepinski@gmail.com>

08.02.2012

do Christopher

Thank you very much for your response.

Can I ask what is the legal entity which is the "guardian" of those documents?
It seems that from time to time some institutes get limited access to
them, so perhaps such query can be asked by Ministry of Foreign
Affairs. The question is who should be asked.

2012/2/8 Christopher Andrew <cma1001@gmail.com>:

Christopher Andrew <cma1001@gmail.com>

09.02.2012

do mnie

angielski

polski

Przetłumacz wiadomość

Wyłącz dla następującego języka: angielski

Having ceased to work on the material in 2005, I'm not sure what the exact legal position currently is. The official clearance process during the writing of the Mitrokhin Archive is detailed in the introduction to the paperback version of Mitrokhin II. I seem to recall that the lead department was the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. See also the Mitrokhin report of the Intelligence and Security Committee (published in 2000 and available on line). Since M's death, his family also has an interest. There may be a reference to this in the volume (in which I was not involved) of some of his material published in about 2010

best wishes